Sifting through the Slush Pile: What Happens after You Query a Publisher



Once upon a time, I worked for the editorial office of a small publisher. The most fascinating, heart-breaking, and frustrating part of my day was when I had to read through manuscripts in the slush pile.

As many people know, the slush pile is what publishers call their collections of unsolicited query letters and manuscripts. These may have come from authors themselves or from literary agents who had no previous relationship with the press.

Because a lot of people don’t know exactly what happens once they send their manuscript to join the slush pile, I want to share my experience. Full disclosure: I am only describing my personal involvement with a single, small, nonfiction publisher. Different types of publishers likely treat their slush piles very differently. 

When an author sent an unsolicited manuscript to the publisher, that manuscript ended up one of several places: an editorial assistant’s desk or an intern’s desk. From there, a staff member or an intern skimmed the query letter and did a quick, single-page analysis of who the author was, whether the manuscript sounded interesting, and if the manuscript would be a good fit for the press. These short summaries were then sent on to the main editor in the relevant subject area who would make the final decision on whether or not the press should move the manuscript forward in the publication process.

This procedure wasn’t wholly terrible for the author. Someone, often a peon like me, read every query letter and skimmed a chapter or two if one was available. For every declined manuscript, we sent a personalized rejection letter. If we liked a manuscript but thought it wasn’t a good fit for our press, we would also include the names of other publishers that might be interested in the piece. Very occasionally, editors would offer a few suggestions about how to improve the manuscript. One of the not-so-secret secrets at the press was that we wanted authors to succeed even if we didn’t think they would do well with us. Manuscripts from the slush pile did occasionally make it to publication, but these random queries resulted in publication much less frequently than other types of queries.

Slush pile processing made it difficult to deeply assess query letters and manuscripts. I had very little time to read through the materials and had to make very quick judgments about the quality and appropriateness of the work. This meant that I relied heavily on query letters to show me that authors knew how to present their book, knew it would be a good fit for the press, and knew how to write well. I always hope that I didn’t overlook world changing manuscript just because the author wrote a terrible query letter, but I can’t promise that I didn’t. There simply wasn’t time to dig deeper.

If you send a manuscript to  slush pile, remember that it will probably end up in the hands of someone like me, someone who loves making books come to life, someone who wants author to succeed. (Even if the rejection letters can sound a bit robotic.)

Hopefully in the future I’ll be able to share a bit more about what information was helpful to me when reading query letters. If you have any questions or if there is a topic that you would like to hear more about, let me know, and I’ll see if I can incorporate it.

—     —     —

*This post originally ran August 8, 2016*


18 thoughts on “Sifting through the Slush Pile: What Happens after You Query a Publisher

  1. This is a great post, very informative. Everything pretty much is emailed today, so I assume that query letters are read. Following the guidelines of the agent or publisher is key as well.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I suspect many of us expect to wind up in the slush pile sooner or later. It’s nice to know that at least we can still hope for real people to read our queries first! I wonder when the robots will finally take over.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Ha! Hopefully they won’t take that role too soon. Luckily I think most publishing professionals like having a fairly intense amount of control over the manuscripts that make it through, so I imagine it will be a little while before slush piles are automated.


  3. The idea of the query letter is still daunting. If it were me, I wouldn’t want to read a lot of phrases, but only the serious blurb that describes the book’s action. But the submitter really doesn’t know, from the guidelines posted on publishers’ and agents’ sites. I’ve had office education; I can write a business letter . . . but wouldn’t you rather read a paragraph with two or three pieces of relevant contact information? And, these days, wouldn’t you like a link to my site, where, if interested, you get my art, my theme music, the whole package?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Query letter preferences definitely vary by publisher and by publication genre. That is why it is so important for writers to research the places they are querying. (I can hardly imagine how people tried to get published in the land before the internet. Without the vast resources that now exist, the entire process must have been horrible.)

      You’re right though that social media and websites can make a difference, especially for primarily digital publications.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s